Life: A complex Immoral Food Chain

Life: A complex Immoral Food Chain

I would like to write this article as preliminary thought process or development of the concept. I humbly ask the readers look at this article as an experimental concept.
“What are laws or constitution? God didn’t come down and wrote it? Special humans like us wrote it for common people like you and while writing it, special people made sure they are not part of it’s moral policing”  – A Monologue from Rann Movie
The conflict between morals and immorality is ages old. Perception of what’s right and what’s wrong have seen evolutionary changes over the last decade if not last 100 years or last 1000 years.
जब बड़ा पेड़ गिरता हे तो उसके आसपास की ज़मीन हिल जाती हे. इस चुनाव में कुछ ऐसा ही तूफान आने वाला हे. बड़े आदमी को मारने वाला और भी बड़ा बन जाता हे – राजीव गाँधी
Since I was able to understand the concept of bureaucratic / autocratic system and mass/followers, I started questioning why morals mostly apply to mass and why immorality becomes an essential tool for a ruler?
What we call God depends upon our tribe, because God is tribal. God takes sides. No man in the sky intervenes. I figured out way back if God is all-powerful, He cannot be all good. And if He is all good, then He cannot be all-powerful.
We all belong from a different background of employment or caste system or educational system or society. The only thing common in our differential backgrounds is the chain system of duties. A larger number of lower level duty holders to decreasing number of superior duty holders.
We have implemented food chain system of nature in our lives of society. As from a large number of small fishes to one shark, a large number of trees to deer to singular king lion, mass/followers to administrative officers to singular kingship in the monarchy and many entry-level employees to singular CEO.
Food chain system is part of our daily activities. 
“If you kill one for selfish reason, you are a murderer but if you kill 1000s for hypocritical political cause, you are a leader” – Paritala Ravi
The beautiful part is what differentiates between mass and leader. What does it take to be at top of the food chain of your individual field? I have wondered why lion’s life will not be influenced by the death of a deer and his/her ailing children, why Mukesh Ambani’s life will not be influenced by the death of watchman or the ailing children of his xyz office?
“Ability to use collateral damage for one’s benefit or crying about it differentiate leaders and followers”
When a person reaches at the top of food chain in their individual field, they can not afford to be neutral or general. They need an absolute opinion as black or white. Against system or with the system and if against the system, he/she/it may support rebel/opposing side and if their gamble pan out, they would enjoy immense power or suffer a miserable failure. That’s hauntingly beautiful pros and cons of being at top of food chain.
“There is nothing wrong and right, whoever has power even his wrong becomes right”
After being at top of food chain one can not afford to show empathy towards any individual as support from a powerful person can create turbulence or inequality in the system. The duty of powerful person or person at top of the food chain is to create a policy applicable to all stages of society lives.
जनता एक ऐसी जात हे जो कभी किसी की वफादार नहीं हुई. चाहे वो साम्यवाद हो या समाजवाद या राजाशाही या लोकतंत्र. असंतुष्टि इंसानी मुलस्वभाव हे.
In 1930’s and 1940’s two very different belief’s were at rise. Gandhi with his अहिंसा and Hitler with हिंसा. Both represented very opposite/bipolar concepts, yet mass/population of their own country supported them an helped them reach to the top of food chain. Mass will support their leader regardless of leader’s past or beliefs as long as leader is satisfying/catering needs of mass.
“Only an enuch won’t use his power” – Obul Reddy
To conclude, One can be just another face of mass or the face (leader) of mass,
In other words one’s grave can be one among 50 or one grave acquiring land of 50,
All depends how many lives you can influence during and at decline of your existence. Success matters regardless of means to achieve it.

Note: All the opinions and statements are only that of the author of this article.